1. D. Bouyssou and Th. Marchant. An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM II: More than two categories. Cahier du LAMSADE 230, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2005. Keyword(s): decision with multiple attributes, sorting, noncompensation, conjoint measurement, ELECTRE TRI. [bibtex-entry]



2. D. Bouyssou and Th. Marchant. An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: The case of two categories. Cahier du LAMSADE 229, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2005. Keyword(s): decision with multiple attributes, sorting, noncompensation, conjoint measurement, ELECTRE TRI, twofold partitions. [bibtex-entry]



3. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. Further results on concordance relations. Cahier du LAMSADE 231, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2005. Keyword(s): multiple criteria analysis, concordance, outranking methods, conjoint measurement, nontransitive preferences. [bibtex-entry]



4. M. Kumar and N. Patel. Clustering data with measurement errors. Technical report RRR 12-2005, RUTCOR, Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Jersey, 2005. [bibtex-entry]



5. C. Rocha and L. C. Dias. An idea for ordinal sorting based on ELECTRE without category limits. Rechearch Report 9, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2005. Keyword(s): multi-criteria decision aiding, sorting, ELECTRE, aggregation/disaggregation. [bibtex-entry]



6. T. Tervonen, J. Almeida Dias, J. Figueira, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen. SMAA-TRI: A parameter stability analysis method for ELECTRE TRI. Research Report 6, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2005. Keyword(s): SMAA-TRI, multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA), ELECTRE TRI, stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA), stability analysis, robust conclusions. [bibtex-entry]

1. P. Hammer, A. Kogan, and M. Lejeune. Modeling country risk ratings using partial orders. Technical report RRR 24-2004, RUTCOR, Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Jersey, USA, 2004. [bibtex-entry]



2. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. Research Report 17, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2004. Keyword(s): multicriteria decision aiding, sorting, inconsistent judgment, assignment examples, inconsistency analysis for LP. [bibtex-entry]



3. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. Cahier du LAMSADE 221, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2004. Keyword(s): multicriteria decision aiding, sorting, inconsistent judgment, assignment examples, inconsistency analysis for LP. [bibtex-entry]

1. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. A characterization of concordance relations. Cahier du LAMSADE 211, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria analysis, concordance, outranking methods, conjoint measurement, nontransitive preferences. [bibtex-entry]



2. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. Conjoint measurement tools for MCDM: A brief introduction. Cahier du LAMSADE 210, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. Keyword(s): conjoint Measurement, additive value function, preference modelling. [bibtex-entry]



3. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. Following the traces: An introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity. Cahier du LAMSADE 209, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria analysis, multiple criteria analysis, measurement theory, conjoint measurement, nontransitive preferences. [bibtex-entry]



4. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. Ordinal aggregation and strict preferences for multi-attributed alternatives. Cahier du LAMSADE 212, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. Keyword(s): conjoint measurement, ordinal aggregation, nontransitive preferences, noncompensatory preferences. [bibtex-entry]



5. L. C. Dias and V. Mousseau. IRIS- Interactive robustness analysis and parameters' inference for multicriteria sorting problems (Version 2.0) - User manual. Documents en ligne du LAMSADE 128, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. [bibtex-entry]



6. L. C. Dias and V. Mousseau. IRIS- Interactive robustness analysis and parameters' inference for multicriteria sorting problems (version 2.0) - User manual. Documents of INESC 1, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2003. [bibtex-entry]



7. J. Figueira, Y. De Smet, and J.-P. Brans. MCDA methods for sorting and clustering problems: PROMETHEE TRI and PROMETHEE CLUSTER. Technical report 12, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision analysis, sorting, clustering, PROMETHEE methodology. [bibtex-entry]



8. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. On the notion of category size in multiple criteria sorting models. Research Report 1, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision analysis, sorting, category size. [bibtex-entry]



9. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. On the notion of category size in multiple criteria sorting models. Cahier du LAMSADE 205, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. [bibtex-entry]



10. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. On the notion of category size in multiple criteria sorting models. DIMACS Research Report 2003-02, Rutgers Univerity, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision analysis, sorting, category size. [bibtex-entry]

1. G. Alexe, S. Alexe, P. Hammer, and A. Kogan. Comprehensive vs. comprehensible classifiers in logical analysis of data. Technical report RRR 9-2002, RUTCOR, Rutgers Center for Operations Research, New Jersey, USA, 2002. [bibtex-entry]



2. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. 'Additive difference' models without additivity and subtractivity. Cahier du LAMSADE 206, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2002. Keyword(s): conjoint measurement, nontransitive preferences, additive difference model, cancellation conditions. [bibtex-entry]



3. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, dominance, and numerical representations. Cahier du LAMSADE 207, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2002. Keyword(s): conjoint measurement, nontransitive preferences, decision analysis with multiple attributes, dominance, traces. [bibtex-entry]



4. V. Mousseau and L. C. Dias. Inferring ELECTRE's veto-related parameters from outranking examples. Cahier du LAMSADE 198, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2002. Keyword(s): parameters inference procedures, valued outranking relations, ELECTRE, discordance, veto. [bibtex-entry]



5. V. Mousseau and L. C. Dias. Inferring ELECTRE's veto-related parameters from outranking examples. Research Report 5, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2002. Keyword(s): parameters inference procedures, valued outranking relations, ELECTRE, discordance, veto. [bibtex-entry]



6. B. Roy. Présentation et interprétation de la méthode ELECTRE TRI pour affecter des zones dans des catégories de risque. Document du LAMSADE 124, LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2002. [bibtex-entry]

1. J. N. Clímaco, L. C. Dias, J. Figueira, C. Gomes da Silva, and V. Mousseau. Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. Cahier du LAMSADE 178, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2001. Keyword(s): IRIS. [bibtex-entry]



2. V. Mousseau and L. C. Dias. Fuzzy outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures. DIMACS Research Report 2001-27, Rutgers Univerity, 2001. Keyword(s): fuzzy outranking relations, veto effect, parameters inference procedures, ELECTRE. [bibtex-entry]



3. V. Mousseau and L. C. Dias. Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures. Cahier du LAMSADE 189, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2001. Keyword(s): multiple criteria analysis, valued outranking relations, veto effect, parameter inference procedures, ELECTRE. [bibtex-entry]

1. J. N. Clímaco, L. C. Dias, J. Figueira, C. Gomes da Silva, and V. Mousseau. Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. Research Report 7, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2000. Keyword(s): IRIS. [bibtex-entry]



2. L. C. Dias, V. Mousseau, J. Figueira, and J. N. Clímaco. An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. Cahier du LAMSADE 174, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2000. Keyword(s): IRIS. [bibtex-entry]



3. A. Ngo The and V. Mousseau. Using assignment examples to infer category limits for the ELECTRE TRI method. Cahier du LAMSADE 168, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2000. Keyword(s): assignment problem, ELECTRE TRI, category limit elicitation, inference procedure. [bibtex-entry]

1. V. Mousseau, R. Słowiński, and P. Zielniewicz. ELECTRE TRI 2.0a: Methodological guide and user's documentation. Document du LAMSADE 111, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 1999. [bibtex-entry]

1. B. Roy and J. Figueira. Détermination des poids des critères dans les méthodes de type ELECTRE avec la technique de Simos révisée. Cahier du LAMSADE 109, LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, 1998. [bibtex-entry]

1. V. Mousseau, J. Figueira, and J.-P. Naux. Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results. Cahier du LAMSADE 150, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 1997. Keyword(s): sorting problematic, preference disaggregation, weight elicitation, numerical experiments. [bibtex-entry]

1. V. Mousseau and R. Słowiński. Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Cahier du LAMSADE 140, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 1996. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision aid, sorting, ELECTRE TRI, parameters' elicitation, inference procedure, optimization. [bibtex-entry]

1. W. Yu. ELECTRE TRI : Aspects méthodologiques et manuel d'utilisation. Document du LAMSADE 74, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 1992. [bibtex-entry]

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All person copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Les documents contenus dans ces répertoires sont rendus disponibles par les auteurs qui y ont contribué en vue d'assurer la diffusion à temps de travaux savants et techniques sur une base non-commerciale. Les droits de copie et autres droits sont gardés par les auteurs et par les détenteurs du copyright, en dépit du fait qu'ils présentent ici leurs travaux sous forme électronique. Les personnes copiant ces informations doivent adhérer aux termes et contraintes couverts par le copyright de chaque auteur. Ces travaux ne peuvent pas être rendus disponibles ailleurs sans la permission explicite du détenteur du copyright.

This document was translated from BibT_EX by bibtex2html