1. L. Montano Guzmán. Fuzzy Measures and Integrals in the MCDA Sorting Problematic: Methodology and Aplications to the Diagnosis of Firms. PhD Thesis, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, 2003. [bibtex-entry]

1. C. Araz and I. Ozkarahan. Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Prodution Economics, 2006. Note: In Press. Keyword(s): supplier selection and evaluation, product development, multicriteria sorting. [bibtex-entry]



2. Y. Chen, D. Kilgour, and K. Hipel. Multiple criteria classification with an application in water resources planning. Computers & Operations Research, 33(11):3301-3323, 2006. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision aid, sorting, nominal classification, resource management. [bibtex-entry]



3. S. Damart, L. C. Dias, and V. Mousseau. Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS. Decision Support Systems, 2006. Note: In Press. Keyword(s): classification / sorting, group decision making / GDSS, multi-criteria decision making, imprecise information. [bibtex-entry]



4. K. Jabeur and J.-M. Martel. An ordinal sorting method for group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006. Note: In Press. Keyword(s): group decision-making, ordinal sorting, distance measure, preferences aggregation, preferences relational system, relative importance of the members, multicriteria analysis. [bibtex-entry]



5. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. 4OR: A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research, 4(2):145-158, 2006. Keyword(s): multicriteria decision aiding, sorting, inconsistency analysis. [bibtex-entry]



6. P. Meyer and M. Roubens. Choice, Ranking and Sorting in Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, volume 78 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, chapter 12, pages 471-506. Springer, New York, 2005. Keyword(s): aggregation with fuzzy environment, fuzzy choice, ordinal ordered sorting, Choquet integral, TOMASO. [bibtex-entry]



7. J.-L. Marichal, P. Meyer, and M. Roubens. Sorting multi-attribute alternatives: The TOMASO method. Computers & Operations Research, 32(4):861-877, 2005. Keyword(s): multi-attribute decision-making, ordinal data, interacting points of view, Choquet integral, TOMASO. [bibtex-entry]



8. M. Doumpos and C. Zopounidis. Developing sorting models using preference disaggregation analysis: An experimental investigation. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(3):585-598, 2004. Keyword(s): multicriteria analysis, sorting, preference disaggregation, Monte Carlo simulation. [bibtex-entry]



9. R. Lourenço and J.P. Costa. Using ELECTRE TRI outranking method to sort MOMILP nondominated solutions. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2):271-289, 2004. Keyword(s): sorting, multiple objective mixed integer linear program. [bibtex-entry]



10. L. C. Dias and V. Mousseau. IRIS: A DSS for multiple criteria sorting problems. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(4-5):285 - 298, 2003. Keyword(s): decision support systems, sorting, classification, ELECTRE TRI, software. [bibtex-entry]



11. M. Roubens. Ordinal multiattribute sorting and ordering in the presence of interacting points of view. In D. Bouyssou, E. Jacquet-Lagrèze, P. Perny, R. Słowiński, D. Vanderpooten, and Ph. Vincke, editors, Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria: Essays in Honour of Bernard Roy, volume 44 of International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, pages 229-248. Springer, Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, 2002. Keyword(s): multiattribute decision making, ordinal data, interacting points of view, Choquet integral, TOMASO. [bibtex-entry]



12. K. Dembczynski, S. Greco, and R. Słowiński. Methodology of rough-set-based classification and sorting with hierarchical structure of attributes and criteria. Control & Cybernetics, 31:891-920, 2002. [bibtex-entry]



13. L. C. Dias, V. Mousseau, J. Figueira, and J. N. Clímaco. An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2):332-348, 2002. Keyword(s): multiple criteria analysis, sorting, aggregation/disaggregation, robustness and sensitivity analysis, IRIS. [bibtex-entry]



14. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Słowiński. Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2):247-259, 2002. Keyword(s): rough sets, sorting, classification, multiple criteria decision analysis, decision rules. [bibtex-entry]



15. J. Léger and J.-M. Martel. A multicriteria assignment procedure for a nominal sorting problematic. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2):349-364, 2002. Keyword(s): multicriteria method, nominal sorting problematic, classification, assignment, similarity. [bibtex-entry]



16. M. F. Norese and S. Viale. A multi-profile sorting procedure in the public administration. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2):365-379, 2002. Keyword(s): multiple criteria analysis, sorting, multi-profile intersecting reference set, decision aiding, decision support systems. [bibtex-entry]



17. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos. Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2):229-246, 2002. Keyword(s): multiple criteria analysis, classification, sorting, utility functions, outranking relations, decision rules, preference disaggregation. [bibtex-entry]



18. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos. Multicriteria sorting methods. In C. Floudas and P. Pardalos, editors, Encyclopedia of Optimization, volume III, pages 501-516. Springer, Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, 2001. Keyword(s): sorting, multicriteria analysis, goal programming, outranking relation, preference disaggregation. [bibtex-entry]



19. M. Doumpos and C. Zopounidis. Assessing financial risks using a multicriteria sorting procedure: The case of country risk assessment. Omega - The International Journal of Management Science, 29(1):97-109, 2001. Keyword(s): classification, country risk, discriminant analysis, multicriteria. [bibtex-entry]



20. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Słowiński. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1):1-47, 2001. Keyword(s): multicriteria decision analysis, rough sets, classification, sorting, choice, ranking, decision rules, conjoint measurement. [bibtex-entry]



21. C. Arondel and P. Girardin. Sorting cropping systems on the basis of their impact on groundwater quality. European Journal of Operational Research, 127(3):467-482, 2000. Keyword(s): agriculture, cropping system, environment, groundwater quality, multi-criteria analysis. [bibtex-entry]



22. M. Doumpos, C. Zopounidis, and P. Pardalos. Multicriteria sorting methodology: Application to financial decision problems. Parallel Algorithms and Applications, 15(1-2):113-129, 2000. [bibtex-entry]



23. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos. PREFDIS: A multicriteria decision support system for sorting decision problems. Computers & Operations Research, 27(7-8):779-797, 2000. Keyword(s): decision support systems, multiple criteria decision aid, sorting, PREFDIS, UTADIS. [bibtex-entry]



24. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos. A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: The case of financial distress. Computational Economics, 14(3):197-218, 1999. Keyword(s): bankruptcy risk, discriminant analysis, financial distress, multicriteria decision aid, ordinal regression, sorting, FINCLAS. [bibtex-entry]



25. V. Mousseau and R. Słowiński. Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization, 12(2):157-174, 1998. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision aid, sorting, ELECTRE TRI, parameters‘ elicitation, inference procedure, optimization. [bibtex-entry]



26. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos. A multicriteria method for sorting decision problems under uncertainty. Fuzzy Economic Review, 2(1):3-15, 1997. [bibtex-entry]



27. Z. Pawlak and R. Słowiński. Decision analysis using rough sets. International Transactions in Operational Research, 1(1):107-114, 1994. Keyword(s): decision analysis, rough set theory, vagueness, multiple criteria, sorting. [bibtex-entry]



28. Z. Pawlak and R. Słowiński. Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 72(3):443-459, 1994. Keyword(s): decision, multiple attributes, rough set theory, vagueness, sorting, conflict analysis, explanation, prescription. [bibtex-entry]

1. D. Bouyssou and Th. Marchant. An axiomatic approach to ELECTRE TRI. In J.-P. Barthélemy and P. Lenca, editors, Advances in multicriteria decision aid / Progrès en aide multicritère à la décision, Brest, Luxembourg, pages 9-20, 2005. ENST Bretagne, GET / ENST Bretagne. Keyword(s): decision with multiple attributes, sorting, noncompensation, conjoint measurement, ELECTRE TRI, twofold partitions. [bibtex-entry]



2. P. Meyer. Use of an ordinal sorting technique (TOMASO) in stock selection. In J.-P. Barthélemy and P. Lenca, editors, Advances in Multicriteria Decision Aid / Progrès en Aide Multicritère à la Décision, Brest, Luxembourg, pages 110-118, 2005. ENST Bretagne, GET / ENST Bretagne. Keyword(s): TOMASO, stock selection, Choquet integral. [bibtex-entry]

1. D. Bouyssou and Th. Marchant. An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM II: More than two categories. Cahier du LAMSADE 230, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2005. Keyword(s): decision with multiple attributes, sorting, noncompensation, conjoint measurement, ELECTRE TRI. [bibtex-entry]



2. D. Bouyssou and Th. Marchant. An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: The case of two categories. Cahier du LAMSADE 229, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2005. Keyword(s): decision with multiple attributes, sorting, noncompensation, conjoint measurement, ELECTRE TRI, twofold partitions. [bibtex-entry]



3. C. Rocha and L. C. Dias. An idea for ordinal sorting based on ELECTRE without category limits. Rechearch Report 9, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2005. Keyword(s): multi-criteria decision aiding, sorting, ELECTRE, aggregation/disaggregation. [bibtex-entry]



4. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. Research Report 17, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2004. Keyword(s): multicriteria decision aiding, sorting, inconsistent judgment, assignment examples, inconsistency analysis for LP. [bibtex-entry]



5. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. Cahier du LAMSADE 221, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2004. Keyword(s): multicriteria decision aiding, sorting, inconsistent judgment, assignment examples, inconsistency analysis for LP. [bibtex-entry]



6. L. C. Dias and V. Mousseau. IRIS- Interactive robustness analysis and parameters' inference for multicriteria sorting problems (Version 2.0) - User manual. Documents en ligne du LAMSADE 128, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. [bibtex-entry]



7. L. C. Dias and V. Mousseau. IRIS- Interactive robustness analysis and parameters' inference for multicriteria sorting problems (version 2.0) - User manual. Documents of INESC 1, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2003. [bibtex-entry]



8. J. Figueira, Y. De Smet, and J.-P. Brans. MCDA methods for sorting and clustering problems: PROMETHEE TRI and PROMETHEE CLUSTER. Technical report 12, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision analysis, sorting, clustering, PROMETHEE methodology. [bibtex-entry]



9. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. On the notion of category size in multiple criteria sorting models. Research Report 1, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision analysis, sorting, category size. [bibtex-entry]



10. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. On the notion of category size in multiple criteria sorting models. Cahier du LAMSADE 205, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 2003. [bibtex-entry]



11. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira. On the notion of category size in multiple criteria sorting models. DIMACS Research Report 2003-02, Rutgers Univerity, 2003. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision analysis, sorting, category size. [bibtex-entry]



12. V. Mousseau and R. Słowiński. Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Cahier du LAMSADE 140, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France, 1996. Keyword(s): multiple criteria decision aid, sorting, ELECTRE TRI, parameters' elicitation, inference procedure, optimization. [bibtex-entry]

1. C. Araz and I. Ozkarahan. F-PROMETHEE TRI and F-PROMSORT: Fuzzy multicriteria sorting procedures, 2006. [bibtex-entry]



2. J.-L. Marichal, P. Meyer, and M. Roubens. Multiple criteria sorting : TOMASO - A solution in the presence of interacting points of view. Newsletter of the European Working Group ``Multicriteria Aid for Decisions'', Nº 9(3), pages 10-12, 2004. Keyword(s): TOMASO. [bibtex-entry]



3. P. Meyer and M. Roubens. Ordinal sorting in the presence of interacting points of view: TOMASO. In: 25th Linz Seminar on Fuzzy Set Theory, Mathematics of Fuzzy Systems, 2004. Note: Linz, February 3-7 2004, pp. 144-152. Keyword(s): TOMASO. [bibtex-entry]



4. J.-L. Marichal, P. Meyer, and M. Roubens. On a sorting procedure in the presence of qualitative interacting points of view. , 2002. Keyword(s): multi-attribute decision-making, ordinal data, interacting points of view, Choquet integral, TOMASO. [bibtex-entry]

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All person copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Les documents contenus dans ces répertoires sont rendus disponibles par les auteurs qui y ont contribué en vue d'assurer la diffusion à temps de travaux savants et techniques sur une base non-commerciale. Les droits de copie et autres droits sont gardés par les auteurs et par les détenteurs du copyright, en dépit du fait qu'ils présentent ici leurs travaux sous forme électronique. Les personnes copiant ces informations doivent adhérer aux termes et contraintes couverts par le copyright de chaque auteur. Ces travaux ne peuvent pas être rendus disponibles ailleurs sans la permission explicite du détenteur du copyright.

This document was translated from BibT_EX by bibtex2html